WASHINGTON – The
Concord Coalition today released the Convention Edition of its Election 2008
“Key Questions” brochure. Representatives of The Concord Coalition will
distribute the brochure at both the Democratic and Republican National
Conventions. The brochure proposes questions that citizens and the media should
ask candidates about the federal budget and the nation’s fiscal future. Each
question features background information to provide context on these critical
issues.
WASHINGTON – The
Concord Coalition today released the Convention Edition of its Election 2008
“Key Questions” brochure. Representatives of The Concord Coalition will
distribute the brochure at both the Democratic and Republican National
Conventions. The brochure proposes questions that citizens and the media should
ask candidates about the federal budget and the nation’s fiscal future. Each
question features background information to provide context on these critical
issues.
"The candidates we elect in 2008 will face crucial
decisions about the path of our nation’s fiscal policy. These decisions go well
beyond what may be needed to balance the budget in the short-term. Campaigns
are the best time for voters to find out how candidates plan to deal with the
looming fiscal challenge, or whether they have even thought about it at all. It
is crucial that voters be able to assess whether the candidates appreciate the
magnitude of the looming fiscal challenge, the need for trade-offs, and the
importance of acting sooner rather than later," said Concord Coalition
Executive Director Robert L. Bixby.
"Some candidates will be tempted to tell the voters what they think they
want to hear, rather than what they need to hear. It’s up to the voters to make
each campaign a ‘pander-free’ zone. For our part, we hope these questions
will help in that effort. We also encourage candidates to show initiative by
bringing up these issues themselves, without waiting for the voters to demand
answers. That is what real leadership is about," said Concord Coalition
Field Director Harry Zeeve.
Do you believe that budget deficits matter?
The accumulation of large deficits, year after year, burdens
taxpayers and undermines future living standards. It does so by soaking up
national savings, crowding out investment, and raising interest expenses.
Today’s budget policy threatens to place ever-tighter constraints on the
ability of future citizens to determine their own fiscal priorities. It also
increases our reliance on borrowing from other countries; in effect, mortgaging
our future national income. The United States would be in a stronger position
to weather difficult times, address emerging national needs and invest in
future economic growth if it had greater flexibility and strength in its fiscal
position.
Do you have a plan
to balance the federal budget?
There is no quick fix. However, commitment to a balanced
budget is a good first step. Restoring a balanced budget would increase national
savings, lower future interest costs, signal to world financial markets that we
are serious about getting our fiscal house in order, and reduce our dependence
on foreign lenders. Yet, even with a near-term balanced budget plan, current
fiscal policy would remain unsustainable over the long term. A serious effort
to maintain sound fiscal policies will require policymakers to tackle the
underlying structural imbalance between existing entitlement spending and tax
laws, including the many tax preferences that function as “tax entitlements.”
Eliminating, or even reducing, the deficit requires tough choices, explicit
tradeoffs and bi-partisan cooperation. Insisting that we can solve our fiscal
problems by just cutting spending or just raising taxes is unrealistic.
What specific
spending cuts would you propose to help balance the budget?
Politicians often talk tough on spending without mentioning
what programs they would cut. This is a convenient way to avoid making hard
choices. Vague calls to crack down on “pork” or “waste, fraud and abuse” are
not enough. Similarly, targeting only certain spending categories for scrutiny
is problematic. All parts of the budget must be subject to fiscal scrutiny.
What assumptions
do you make regarding the future of defense spending?
Defense spending is 20% of the federal budget and has
experienced a sharp increase in recent years primarily due to military
operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and growing personnel costs. Last fiscal
year alone, Congress appropriated $182 billion for war costs bringing the total
spending for military action since 2001 to $859 billion. These costs have been
entirely deficit-financed, an historic first for war related expenses, and have
shifted the financial burden to future generations. While savings in the
defense budget can be achieved in a variety of ways (e.g., scaling back or
ending operations in Iraq, cancelling outdated or unproven weapon systems,
eliminating waste) any proposal to direct these “savings” to other programs,
defense or non-defense, simply shifts priorities while relying upon a continued
fiscal policy of borrowing — much of it from abroad.
How do you plan to
deal with the budgetary consequences of extending some or all of the expiring
tax cuts?
Since 2001, Congress has enacted numerous tax cut packages
that expire by 2011. Economists generally acknowledge that tax cuts do not
fully pay for themselves through greater economic growth. Thus, extending the
tax cuts will require substantial spending cuts, an increase in other taxes or
a significantly larger national debt. Both candidates propose tax cut
extensions. McCain would extend all of them and Obama would extend them for
people with incomes below $250,000. Relative to the laws on the books right
now, any extension of expiring tax cuts reduces revenues. The
pay-as-you-go (paygo) budget rules in Congress require that this be fully
offset with spending cuts and/or increases in other taxes. Yet both candidates
propose to exempt these tax cut extensions from the paygo rule, thus ignoring
the revenue loss and giving current tax policy an inevitability it should not
have. In light of the deteriorated
fiscal outlook since the tax cuts were first enacted and the fact that we have
not taken action to prepare for the costs of the baby boomers’ retirement, it
makes sense to ensure any tax cut extension does not do further fiscal damage.
Will you be as
committed to slowing the growth of health costs as you are to expanding health
care coverage?
Dramatically increasing health care costs have a huge impact
on the federal budget. Medicare costs are projected to grow faster than the
economy, and faster than can be reasonably supported. Both candidates talk of
expanding health care coverage, which is an important goal. However, it would not,
by itself, lower health care costs. Yet, as a politically popular reform, it
might provide the momentum for other health care reforms that could slow cost
growth. This linkage between broader coverage and tough cost control will be
crucial for those seeking a fiscally responsible path for the federal budget.
Ultimately our nation must decide what level of health care we wish to provide
as an entitlement and how much we are willing to pay for it. Medicare is a
leader in the health care system, accounting for 20 percent of total spending.
If the next President, with the help of Congress, can agree on meaningful
Medicare reforms, it may well lead the way for necessary reforms of the broader
health care system.
What steps would
you take to close Social Security’s long-term funding gap?
Social Security promises far more in future benefits than it
can deliver under current law. Candidates must confront some tough issues.
Finding a cure for the challenges facing Social Security will require reduced
benefits, increased revenues, or both. Candidates who promise to preserve
benefits at the levels promised under current law should explain where the
money will come from to fund these promises. Likewise, candidates who promise
to oppose any tax increases should explain what changes they would make to
restrain the growth of Social Security costs to stay within current tax levels.
Key Questions Convention Update: http://www.concordcoalition.org/files/uploaded_for_nodes/docs/August08-Key_Questions.pdf
organization dedicated to balanced federal budgets and generationally
responsible fiscal policy. Former U.S. Senators Warren Rudman (R-NH) and Bob
Kerrey (D-NE) serve as Concord’s co-chairs and former Secretary of Commerce
Peter Peterson serves as president.
CONTACT:
Jonathan DeWald
(703) 894-6222
jdewald@concordcoalition.org
